Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-03-10

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE EASTERN MODEL OF EDUCATION AND UPBRINGING IN LITERARY TEXTS AND PROBLEMS OF ITS RECEPTION BY WESTERN READERS (BASED ON THE TRANSLATION OF “SHUM BOLA”)

Ibrohimbek Alisherovich Soatov ,

Abstract

This article examines the artistic representation of the Eastern pedagogical model in Gafur Gulyam’s masterpiece "Shum Bola" and its perception by Western audiences through English translation. The research focuses on the linguacultural distance between the Uzbek collective upbringing system - characterized by the “usta-shogird” (master-apprentice) tradition, community oversight (mahalla), and moral didacticism - and Western individualistic social norms. Using comparative-typological and receptive analysis, the study identifies the specific challenges faced by translators in conveying national values to foreign readers. The findings suggest that while the narrative remains engaging, certain pedagogical nuances, such as strict discipline and spiritual blessings (duo), may undergo conceptual shifts in the target culture. The article concludes that successful translation requires a balance between domestication and foreignization to preserve the original didactic spirit for the Western audience.

Keywords

Eastern upbringing, Western reader, reception problems, “usta-shogird” system, social norms, linguaculturology, literary translation, cultural gap, didactic discourse.

References

Baker, M. (2011). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge.

Bassnett, S. (2013). Translation. London: Routledge.

Gulyam, G. (2013). The Mischievous Boy (I. Tukhtasinov, Trans.). Tashkent: Uzbekistan Publishing House.

Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.

Hermans, T. (Ed.). (1985). The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. London: Croom Helm.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. University of Minnesota Press.

Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena.

Katan, D. (2004). Translating Cultures: An Introduction for Translators, Interpreters and Mediators. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

Mahmudov, N. (2012). Tilning mukammal tadqiqi yo‘llari: Lingvokulturologiya. Toshkent: Mumtoz so‘z.

Maslova, V. A. (2001). Lingvokulturologiya. Moskva: Akademiya.

Munday, J. (2016). Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. London: Routledge.

Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.

Nord, C. (1997). Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.

O’Sullivan, E. (2005). Comparative Children's Literature. London: Routledge.

Sharafiddinov, O. (2001). Ijodni anglash baxti. Toshkent: Sharq.

Venuti, L. (2008). The Translator's Invisibility: A History of Translation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Soatov, I. A. . (2026). THE REPRESENTATION OF THE EASTERN MODEL OF EDUCATION AND UPBRINGING IN LITERARY TEXTS AND PROBLEMS OF ITS RECEPTION BY WESTERN READERS (BASED ON THE TRANSLATION OF “SHUM BOLA”). Oriental Journal of Philology, 6(03), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-03-10