Articles
| Open Access |
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-04-34
COGNITIVE-PRAGMATIC MECHANISMS OF INFORMATION STRUCTURING IN SCIENTIFIC TEXT AND PRINCIPLES OF THEIR STUDY IN THE ABSTRACT
Mavjuda Khudayorovna Eshchanova ,Abstract
The research article abstract is a highly condensed genre in which writers must package the essential content of a study for rapid processing by readers. This paper offers a theoretical-analytical account of the cognitive-pragmatic mechanisms that govern the structuring of information in scientific text and derives principles for studying these mechanisms in the abstract. Integrating three explanatory layers – the cognitive-pragmatic organisation of given and new information, the theme-rheme dynamics of Functional Sentence Perspective, and the rhetorical move structure of the abstract – the study argues that information structuring in the abstract is driven by cognitive economy and relevance, and that each rhetorical move carries a characteristic information-structure signature. On this basis, a set of methodological principles for the corpus-based study of information structuring in abstracts is proposed.
Keywords
information structuring, cognitive pragmatics, given–new information, theme–rheme, Functional Sentence Perspective, research article abstract, move structure.
References
Chafe W. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view // Subject and Topic / C.N. Li (ed.). – New York: Academic Press, 1976. – P. 25–55.
Daneš F. Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text // Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective / F. Daneš (ed.). – Prague: Academia, 1974. – P. 106–128.
Firbas J. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. – 239 p.
Hakimov M. O‘zbek tilida matnning pragmatik talqini: Filologiya fanlari doktori diss. – Toshkent, 2001. – 262 b.
Halliday M.A.K., Matthiessen C.M.I.M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. – London: Arnold, 2004. – 689 p.
Hyland K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. – London: Longman, 2000. – 211 p.
Lambrecht K. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. – 388 p.
Lorés R. On R.A. abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organisation // English for Specific Purposes. – 2004. – Vol. 23, No. 3. – P. 280–302.
Prince E.F. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information // Radical Pragmatics / P. Cole (ed.). – New York: Academic Press, 1981. – P. 223–255.
Shahobiddinova Sh., Egamnazarova D. The history and main directions of research on the theory of the actual division of the sentence // Scientific Bulletin. Humanitarian Studies. – 2020. – No. 5(49).
Sperber D., Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. – Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. – 326 p.
Swales J.M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 260 p.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mavjuda Khudayorovna Eshchanova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.