Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-05-02

MYTHOPOETIC FEATURES OF APOCALYPTIC MOTIFS AND THEIR DOMINANT MYTHOLOGICAL IMAGERY

Bakhodir Kholikov ,

Abstract

The article provides a comparative-typological analysis of the mythopoetic nature of eschatological (doomsday) motifs in world mythology and of the dominant mythological images activated within these motifs. The source base comprises the Ragnarök plot of Scandinavian-English mythology, Sumerian-Akkadian and scriptural accounts of the universal flood, Turkic (Altai-Khakas) narratives connected with Ülgen and Erlik, and the layer of Uzbek folklore enriched by Islamic notions of the hereafter. The analysis identifies a four-stage mythopoetic model of the eschatological motif: violation of the norm – catastrophe – purification – rebirth; the dominant images are classified into the groups of demiurge, eschatological antagonist, seer, salvific vessel and the surviving restorative pair. It is argued that in English mythology the destruction of the world is cyclical and cosmological, whereas in Uzbek mythology it is linear and morally accountable in character.

Keywords

mythopoetics, eschatology, doomsday, Ragnarök, universal flood, dominant mythological image, demiurge, demonology, archetype, comparative literary studies.

References

Эшонқул Ж. Миф ва бадиий тафаккур. – Тошкент: Фан, 2019. – 312 б.

Жўраев М., Нарзиқулова М. Миф, фольклор ва адабиёт. – Тошкент: Ўзбекистон Миллий кутубхонаси, 2006. – 208 б.

Жўраев М. Ўзбек халқ самовий афсоналари. – Тошкент: Фан, 1995. – 108 б.

Koblanov Zh., Ryskiyeva A., Amirbekova A. et al. Mythopoetics as a Subject and Method of Literary Research // Forum for Linguistic Studies. – 2025. – Vol. 7, Issue 4. – P. 468–476. DOI: 10.30564/fls.v7i4.7545

Стурлусон С. Младшая Эдда / пер. О.А. Смирницкая, М.И. Стеблин-Каменский. – Москва: Наука. – 138 с.

Қуръони карим. Маъноларининг таржима ва тафсири. Таржима ва тафсир муаллифи Шайх Абдулазиз Мансур. – Тошкент: Сано-стандарт. – 624 б.

Юнг К.Г. Душа и миф: шесть архетипов. – Киев, 1996. – 384 с.

Eliade M. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. – New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1957. – 256 p.

Мелетинский Е.М. Демиург // Мифы народов мира: Энциклопедия. – Москва, 1980. – Т. 1. – 366 с.

Бердяев Н.А. Опыт эсхатологической метафизики (1947) // Царство Духа и царство Кесаря. – Москва, 1995. – 265 с.

Norsker A. Genesis 6,5–9,17: A Rewritten Babylonian Flood Myth // Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament. – 2015. – Vol. 29, No. 1. DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2015.1025545

Hultgård A. The End of the World in Scandinavian Mythology: A Comparative Perspective on Ragnarök. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. – P. 1–21. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192867254.003.0001

Hultgård A. Old Scandinavian and Christian eschatology // Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis. – 1990. – Vol. 13. – P. 344–357. DOI: 10.30674/scripta.67184

Сагалаев А.М. Урало-алтайская мифология: Символ и архетип. – Новосибирск: Наука, 1991. – 155 c.

Мифологический словарь / гл. ред. Е.М. Мелетинский. – Москва: Советская энциклопедия, 1991. – 736 с.

Мифология Британских островов: Энциклопедия. – Москва: ЭКСМО; СПб.: Terra Fantastica, 2004. – 640 с.

Sigurðsson G. Vafþrúðnismál // Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde. Bd. 32. – Berlin; New York, 2006. – 129 s.

Turdimov Sh. Oʻzbek mifologiyasi va folklori. – Toshkent: Ilm va fan nashriyoti, 2023. – 324 b.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Kholikov, B. . (2026). MYTHOPOETIC FEATURES OF APOCALYPTIC MOTIFS AND THEIR DOMINANT MYTHOLOGICAL IMAGERY. Oriental Journal of Philology, 6(05), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-05-02