This article examines the concept of cultural sovereignty from the perspective of social philosophy, analyzing its essence, content, and relationship with the phenomenon of national art. In the context of globalization, the study provides a philosophical and methodological justification for the preservation and development of national artistic traditions and proposes a three-level model of cultural sovereignty consisting of ontological, axiological, and institutional dimensions. The research employs dialectical, hermeneutic, comparative-historical, and systemic-structural approaches.

cultural sovereignty, national art, social consciousness, axiology, globalization, national identity, cultural identity, philosophical methodology.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022 yil 28 yanvardagi PF-60-son “2022–2026 yillarga mo‘ljallangan Yangi O‘zbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasi to‘g‘risida”gi Farmoni // Xalq so‘zi. – 2022. – 29 yanvar.

Путин В.В. Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 25.01.2023 № 35 «О внесении изменений в Основы государственной политики по сохранению и укреплению традиционных российских духовно-нравственных ценностей» // Российская газета. – 2023. – 25 январь.

Куклина Е.А. Культурный суверенитет как фактор национальной безопасности // Лихачёвские международные научные чтения: материалы. – Санкт-Петербург, 2018. – С. 208-217.

Kupriychuk V. Cultural policy as a strategic resource of state modernisation // Ukrainian Culture: Past, Present, Ways of Development. – 2022. – № 43. – P. 43-49.

Nazarov Q. Qadriyatlar falsafasi. – Toshkent: Ma’naviyat, 2019. – B. 12-24.

Nazarov Q. va boshqalar. Falsafa asoslari: darslik. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston faylasuflari milliy jamiyati nashriyoti, 2024. – 384 b.

Protas M. Socio-Philosophical Critique of the Global Public Art's Visual Order: The Context of National Self-identity // American Journal of Art and Design. – 2022. – Vol. 7, № 1. – P. 29-38.

Rousell D. et al. Intersectional and Decolonial Perspectives on an Incorporeal Materialism: Towards an Elemental Philosophy of Art Education // International Journal of Art & Design Education. – 2024. – Vol. 43, № 3. – P. 412-429.

Nurbossynova B. Digital Visual Art as a Social Integrator (on the Example of Digital Art in Kazakhstan) // Proceedings Bali Bhuwana Waskita: Global Art and Creativity Conference. – 2024. – Vol. 4. – P. 1-12.

Purevsuren M., Bor E. The National Identity and Its Elements // International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science. – 2025. – № 1(45). – P. 1-9.

Pavlichenko Y. Representation of National Identity in Contemporary Visual Culture: falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. – Kiyev: Kiyev Milliy Madaniyat va San'at Universiteti, 2023. – 214 b.

Qazaqstan Respublikasy Ökimetì. Qazaqstan Respublikasynyng 2023–2029 jyldarga arnalgan mádeni sayasatynyng tuzhyrymdamasyn bekitu turaly qaulysy // Adilet.zan.kz axborot-huquqiy tizimi. – 2023.

Mantiri O., McCann S. Reclaiming Narratives: Indigenous Sovereignty in Art and Media // British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies: Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2024. – Vol. 5, № 3. – P. 129-138.

Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. – Rev. ed. – London: Verso, 2006. – P. 44-49.

Smith A.D. National Identity. – Reno: University of Nevada Press, 1991. – P. 70-80.

Kymlicka W. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. – P. 148-156.

Hall S. Cultural Identity and Diaspora // Identity: Community, Culture, Difference / ed. by J. Rutherford. – London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1990. – P. 222-237.

Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. – Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996. – P. 27-38.

Castells M. The Power of Identity. – 2nd ed. – Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. – P. 6-12.

Anholt S. Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. – P. 20-30.