This article examines the institution of delicts in Roman private law, focusing on its concept, historical evolution, and main types through the method of historical-legal analysis. The transition from private to public liability for delicts, the composition of the principal delicts (furtum, iniuria, damnum iniuria datum), and the institution of quasi-delicts are analyzed. Particular attention is given to the shift from objective (strict) to subjective (fault-based) liability. The article also addresses the influence of the delict institution on the modern theory of civil liability, including fault-based responsibility and full compensation for harm.

Roman law, delict, obligatio ex delicto, furtum, iniuria, damnum iniuria datum, action, liability, quasi-delict, legal history.

Васильева, Т. Г., Пашаева, О. М. (2008). Римское право. Конспект лекций. Москва: Высшее образование.

Дождев, Д. В. (2019). Римское частное право. Москва: Норма.

Новицкий, И. Б. (2002). Римское право. Москва: Ассоциация «Гуманитарное знание».

Пухан, И., Поленак-Акимовская, М. (2003). Римское право: базовый учебник. Москва: Зерцало.

Холмухамедов, М. М. (2019). Rim xususiy huquqining O‘zbekiston fuqarolik huquqi tizimiga ta’siri masalalari. Yurist axborotnomasi jurnali, 3(45), 22–27.

Gaius. (1935). Gai Institutiones. Seckel, E., Kuebler, B. (tahr.). Leipzig: Teubner. Rim huquqining klassik davriga oid birlamchi manba.

Justinianus I. (1867). Corpus juris civilis academicum parisiense: in quo Justiniani Institutiones, Digesta, sive Pandectae, Codex, Authenticae seu Novellae constitutiones et Edicta comprehenduntur. Paris: A. CotelleYustinian kodifikatsiyasining birlamchi manbasi.

Justinianus I. (533). Institutiones. Corpus Iuris Civilis tarkibida.Yustinian kodifikatsiyasining birlamchi manbasi.