Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-06-09-34%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20

THE PROCEDURAL INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS AND COMPETENT COURTS AND ITS LEGAL NATURE

Farangiz F. Najmiddinova ,

Abstract

This article examines the procedural interrelationship between arbitration tribunals and competent courts and explores its legal nature within the framework of alternative dispute resolution. Particular attention is given to the procedural mechanisms through which competent courts provide assistance to arbitration tribunals, including the granting of interim measures and the securing of evidence. The study further analyzes the interaction between international legal instruments and national legislation governing arbitration proceedings. It identifies key procedural and legal challenges arising from the exercise of judicial assistance and control in arbitration. The article also examines the balance between the autonomy of arbitration tribunals and the supervisory and supportive functions of competent courts. Based on the findings, proposals are developed to improve the legal framework governing the procedural interrelationship between arbitration tribunals and competent courts and to enhance the effectiveness of arbitration proceedings.

Keywords

arbitration tribunal, competent court, procedural interrelationship, arbitration proceedings, judicial assistance, judicial supervision, interim measures, securing of evidence, arbitral award, enforcement, alternative dispute resolution.

References

“2022-2026-yillarga moʻljallangan Yangi Oʻzbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasi toʻgʻrisida” gi Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Farmoni, 28.01.2022 yildagi PF-60-son. Qonunchilik maʼlumotlari milliy bazasi, 29.01.2022-y., 06/22/60/0082-son, https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-5841063

“Hakamlik sudlari faoliyati yanada takomillashtirilishi hamda budjet intizomi kuchaytirilishi munosabati bilan Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining ayrim qonun hujjatlariga qoʻshimcha va oʻzgartirishlar kiritish toʻgʻrisida” gi Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi qonuni. Qonunchilik maʼlumotlari milliy bazasi, 23.04.2026-y., 03/26/1141/0403-son https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-8154966

Xakberdiyev A.A. O‘zbekistonda nizolarni hakamlik sudida hal etish jarayoni: nazariy va amaliy masalalar: yuridik fanlar bo‘yicha doktorlik dissertatsiyasi. – Toshkent, 2023. – B. 173.

Nigel Blackaby, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2009.

Arbitration Act 2001 (Singapore, 2020 Revised Edition). Singapore Statutes Online. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/AA2001

Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China (Adopted at the 9th Session of the Standing Committee of the 8th National People's Congress on August 31, 1994, amended in 2017). National People's Congress of China. [Online source]: https://www.cictar.org.

Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO), § 1050 (Gerichtliche Hilfe bei der Beweisaufnahme und sonstige richterliche Handlungen). Bundesministerium der Justiz. [Online source]: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/zpo/__1050.html

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Najmiddinova, F. F. . (2026). THE PROCEDURAL INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS AND COMPETENT COURTS AND ITS LEGAL NATURE. Oriental Journal of History, Politics and Law, 6(09), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-06-09-34