Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-05-12-71

MECHANISMS FOR IMPROVING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION EFFICIENCY IN UZBEKISTAN BASED ON THE DIGITAL GOVERNMENT PRACTICES OF ESTONIA AND SOUTH KOREA

D.A. Abdullayev ,

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the political and institutional mechanisms embedded in the digital government models of Estonia and South Korea, highlighting their theoretical and practical significance for improving the efficiency of public administration. The study conducts a comparative assessment of the two countries’ experiences based on key criteria such as interactivity, transparency, accountability, data governance, open data policy, and citizen participation. Furthermore, the article identifies the differences between Estonia’s infrastructure-centered model (X-Road, eID) and South Korea’s platform-oriented approach (e-People, KONEPS, Gov24), and scientifically evaluates the prospects for adapting these models to the context of Uzbekistan. The findings offer concrete recommendations for modernizing public administration, strengthening citizen engagement, and enhancing open and accountable governance mechanisms within the framework of the “Uzbekistan – 2030” strategy.

Keywords

digital government; Estonian experience; South Korean model; public administration efficiency; interactivity; transparency; political accountability; open data policy; citizen participation; digital transformation.

References

United Nations. E-Government Survey 2022–2024: The Future of Digital Government. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2024.

OECD. Digital Government Review of Korea 2020: Towards Data-Driven Public Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.

Heeks, Richard. “Reinventing Government in the Information Age.” Routledge, 2001.

Fountain, Jane. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.

Nabatchi, Tina. “Deliberative Democracy and Digital Participation.” Public Administration Review, 2012.

United Nations. E-Government Survey 2022. New York: UN DESA, 2022.

Government of Estonia. Principles of Estonian Information Policy. Tallinn: Estonian Informatics Council, 1994.

Ministry of Education of Estonia. Tiger Leap Program Report 1996–2000. Tallinn, 2001

E-Estonia Briefing Centre. X-Road Data Exchange Layer Overview. Tallinn, 2019.

Trechsel, A. H., & Breuer, F. (2006). E-voting in the 2005 local elections in Estonia and the broader impact for future e-voting projects. In Proceedings of the 2006 national conference on Digital government research - dg.o ’06 (p. 40). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1146598.1146614

Government of Korea. Electronic Government Act, 2001.

OECD. “Korea: Public Sector Transparency Review.” OECD Governance Papers (2018).

United Nations. “KONEPS Case Study.” UN Procurement Capacity Development Report (2017).

United Nations. E-Government Development Index (2010, 2012, 2014).

Robert Krimmer, Electronic Government in Estonia, Government Information Quarterly 34, no. 1 (2017): 20–27.

OECD, Digital Government Review of Korea 2020, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.

Estonian Information System Authority (RIA), Data Tracker Overview, 2021.

World Bank, KONEPS Case Study: Korea’s e-Procurement System, 2018.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Abdullayev, D. . (2025). MECHANISMS FOR IMPROVING PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION EFFICIENCY IN UZBEKISTAN BASED ON THE DIGITAL GOVERNMENT PRACTICES OF ESTONIA AND SOUTH KOREA. Oriental Journal of History, Politics and Law, 5(12), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-05-12-71