This article analyzes the civil law problems of creating derivative works using objects protected by copyright through generative artificial intelligence models. In particular, mass violations in the AI training process and the incompatibility of the "fair use" doctrine with national legislation are revealed. The research is based on international conventions, US court practice, and the national legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan. To protect the rights of creators in the digital environment, practical legal proposals have been developed to introduce the "opt-out" mechanism, establish joint and several liability for damages, and implement collective digital licensing levies into the Civil Code and related legal acts.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Fuqarolik kodeksi (I va II qismlar). O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisining Axborotnomasi, 1996 y., 2-soniga ilova (Qonunchilik ma'lumotlari milliy bazasi, www.lex.uz).

O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 2006-yil 20-iyuldagi "Mualliflik huquqi va turdosh huquqlar to‘g‘risida"gi O‘RQ-42-sonli Qonuni (Qonunchilik ma'lumotlari milliy bazasi, www.lex.uz).

Adabiy va badiiy asarlarni himoya qilish to‘g‘risidagi Bern konvensiyasi (Parij akti, 1971-yil 24-iyul). Jahon Intellektual Mulk Tashkiloti (WIPO). O‘zbekiston Respublikasi uchun 2005-yil 19-apreldan kuchga kirgan.

European Parliament. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union, 2024.

II. Xorijiy sud amaliyoti va ilmiy adabiyotlar

Andersen v. Stability AI (2023). United States District Court, N.D. California. Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO. Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Dismiss.

Gao, L., Biderman, S., Black, S. va boshq. (2021). The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.00027.

Schuhmann, C., Beaumont, R., Vencu, R. va boshq. (2022). LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08402.

Tremblay v. OpenAI (2023). United States District Court, N.D. California. Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc., Case No. 3:23-cv-03223. Class Action Complaint. 9. WIPO (2020). World Intellectual Property Organization. Revised Issues Paper on Intellectual Property Policy and Artificial Intelligence. Document WIPO/IP/AI/2/GE/20/1 Rev., Geneva.